Showing posts sorted by date for query indigenous. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query indigenous. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Monday, August 16, 2021

Dangerous Game: Rudy Rochman’s Indigenous Advocacy (Slideshow Presentation)



In light of the recent attention, Rudy Rochman received following his disastrous publicity stunt in Nigeria, now that he is free, it's time to call out his harmful indigenous advocacy. There are several reasons for this: 
  • Indigenous rights are a progressive, man-made, construct that is antithetical to Torah values. It is a byproduct of western moral relativism and should be far removed from the thought process of all sensible thinking people.

  • Rudy is a leftist! As a peace activist, he actively sanitizes the Arabs and Islam, under the naive assumption that if we only listened to each other’s narrative there would be peace with people. Never mind that the Arab/Islamic world overwhelmingly seeks our genocide. Rudy's peace efforts endanger Jews. Were his insane ideas on security ever implemented (topic for a future article), Jews would be murdered by Arabs who would take advantage of a loosening of security restrictions 

  • Rudy advocates for groups such as the Igbo that are not halachically Jewish, thus perpetuating non-halachic criteria for identifying Jews. The Torah world has been largely silent on this, despite the fact that most Igbo retain or subscribe to Xtian /messianic beliefs.
Watch the slideshow above, and share it with your friends. Find out more about Rudy's problematic ideas which are dangerous for the Jewish soul and body.


Tuesday, October 9, 2018

The Coexistence Cult

Now Featured in The Jewish Press: The Coexistence Cult
“And he shall be a wild ass of a man: his hand shall be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the face of all his brethren.”-Genesis 16:12 (JPS Tanach)
Ari Fuld’s (may G-d avenge his blood) recent murder in Gush Etzion at the hands of a 17-year-old Arab monster, shocked the entire nation; in a country where murder of Jews is commonplace. Ari’s killer couldn’t even grow a beard, but his immersion in a cultural/religious climate of psychopathic evil, compelled him to study vital targets on the human body to kill Jews with a kitchen knife. This is the kind of human disease we are dealing with in Israel. Living things who breath and stand upright and look like men, but who lack the morality of desert jinn or vipers.
As a prominent activist whose videos were featured on Facebook, Ari left an indelible imprint on an audience accustomed to seeing him online. The void was felt by many who never met him but often “saw” him on video. The horror is magnified when you consider the sobering fact that he leaves behind a wife and four children. The myriads of testimonials illustrate that Ari truly loved Eretz Yisroel and the Jewish people. And with his last breath and sacrifice he epitomized this love in the most literal sense.
Like so many acts of Arab savagery against Jews, it was all captured on videotape. The sneak attack on Ari and his brutal stabbing. And his moment of superhuman heroism. The soul screams to the Heavens to watch the grainy footage of an Amalekite lethally stabbing Ari, and then seeing him defy his imminent death by overcoming physical obstacles while stumbling and crashing into walls. Yet he unholstered his gun, took a practiced stance and fired, trying to kill one who exchanged his humanity for the blood Moloch of jihad. Had Ari done nothing he would have died a kadosh by sanctifying Hashem’s as a murdered Jew. But to die while trying to save other Jews he died a Jewish gibor.
As horrifying as it is to watch a Jew being killed, I believe it is important (with the obvious exceptions of children and certain temperaments) to watch the video at least once for several reasons:
1) To honor Ari’s last moments of sacrifice and heroism. I agree with the theory that his heroism might have led to his own death, since given the severity of his wounds, he needed to sit still and try to stop the bleeding until EMT arrived. His attempt to terminate his murderer as he bled to death displayed extraordinary heroism. He was more concerned with saving other Jews, and it may have cost him his life.
 2)To inculcate hatred towards those who wear the Yoke of Amalek. To see the actions of genuine evil. Jews need to understand the concept of evil, which explains the total war we wage against our enemies according to Torah law.
3)To feel, bleed, and cry over a murdered Jew. At the end of the day, Ari is one of so many people who were murdered in Israel for being a Jew. Murdered by Arabs who wouldn’t understand coexistence if it smacked them in the head.
Ari’s murder is an all too common tragedy in our tiny country, where governments shirk their sacred duty of protecting Jewish lives. Benjamin Netanyahu and Likud act no different than the left on issues of security. Consider the southern border of our country and convince me otherwise. Months of devastating arson and terror balloons and insane destruction, with the same pattycake response, from a supposed “right-wing” government. Shameful. When Netanyahu finally loses power, it will be because the Left will have convinced enough people that the supposed party of security failed to protect the country. It matters little that they will continue with the same impotent response to Arab violence.
The Cry of False Peace Prophets
And in the aftermath of this monstrous tragedy, we hear the same perverted voices speaking of coexistence with Arabs. We heard about the site of the murder, Rami Levi, being a haven of “coexistence” for Jews and Arabs. Many of these peace warriors are also naïve “indigenous rights activists”, a good many who believe that Jews AND Arabs are both indigenous, and that we can remain in the land together if we embrace our shared “Semitism”. We hear how Arabs and Jews meet and greet and drink coffee. As I’ve noted before, the Jews of Hebron in 1929 also would have sworn that they had coexistence. Some of them also shared Turkish coffee with their Arab neighbors. And yet, their neighbors butchered them in 1929. The ghosts of Hebron (so close to Gush Etzion) scream out to us that Amalek does indeed reside in our land. That voracious “Am Lak” that lap up blood as a dying man laps up water. It is time to eschew pacifism and gird ourselves in the righteous garb of halachic warfare. Coexistence be damned.
“The Arabs are a cancer in our midst. And you don't coexist with a cancer. A cancer you either cut out, and throw out, or you die.”- (Rabbi Meir Kahane, on 60 Minutes)
I have written about some of these new peaceniks before in my articles  The New Peace Movements Exposed, and The New Indigenous Right: Hardline Or Soft-Boiled? One personality I have not addressed previously is Inon Dan Kehati who heads The Home (Habayit). On September 23, Inon posted the following:
“One week after the murder of Efrat resident, Ari Fuld HYD, we have returned to one of the only islands of sanity and normality in the Judean hills, where Jews and Palestinians shop, work and having coffee together.
The vicious act of the Palestinian terrorist, who took the life of a father of 4, will not deceive us into believing that all Palestinians are terrorists, and will not hold us back working in the most inclusive way, with people from both Jewish and Palestinian communities in the area of Bethlehem and Gush Etzion.
We will continue to expand the inter-communal connections between Palestinians and Jews in Judea and Samaria, and work towards a joint future, based on loyalty to the homeland of the forefathers and foremothers, with the people who live on it, with faith.
The Home is sending our deepest condolences and grief to the Fuld family.”
To be fair, Inon seems sincerer in his deadly naivete than other faces on the new peace circuit, which makes his beliefs much more dangerous. Unlike many of the other “new peace” activists who opine on indigeneity while presumably fressing on majul dates, he and his cadre of believers frequently go out and pick up trash rather than merely opine on their silly fantasy of “understanding narratives” from the confines of contrived orchestrated “meetings”. But dangerous ideas (despite the general belief of their well-intentioned practitioners) remain dangerous regardless of the sincerity of suicidal actions. Such ventures render Jews vulnerable to those who are nursed on the kind of Jew-hatred that would impress Goebbels. Furthermore, more than a few mainstream religious activists have met with Inon and others at these “New Peace” meetings. Meeting with “good Arabs” are akin to the notion of German Jews meeting with token “good German’s” during the Holocaust. Obscene and inappropriate. The only difference is that the Arabs don’t have the power to throw us into the ovens today. They have the desire but lack the means. And history has shown how quickly Arab friends turn sour in the frenzy of massacre.
Beware the foolish new “peace gurus”. Their ideology is no less toxic than the classical peace-fools. The only difference is that they can appeal to a demographic of “religious/traditionalists who would never consider entertaining such notions. They have the added fantasy of thinking they can keep everything (land) with those who overwhelmingly deny our right to anything, including our lives. Shared narratives and the nonsense of a shared indigenous “Semitic” identity is lunacy. Most Arabs would never truly except such idiocy. And at the end of the day, if you watch video footage of some of the more publicized meetings, it becomes evident as Rabbi Meir Kahane stated, that we are dealing with a conflict he deemed “immutable”. Even the decent Arabs in attendance have expectations that could never be met without endangering every Jew in Israel. And to say otherwise is to be disingenuous and patronizing.
To cultivate a hatred of evil, one must understand evil, and the forces of political correctness which render it impossible to examine Islam. As I noted in my article Islam: A reflection on the dominant hatred of our region: Islam's War against the Jews and the Torah:
“Islam is as much a scourge upon the earth as the strain of Naziism. Yet unlike the war against Naziism, there is no international force fighting Islam on the battlefield in a way that represents a definitive war against Islam. Squirmishes here and there. But never against Islam. No current mainstream politician will ever openly declare a war against Islam. The most right-wing politicians still use the term “extremist Islam” or “militant Islam”. And that is the problem.
Too many Jews want to find a common denominator with Islam, a supposed kinship based upon monotheism. From a Torah religious standpoint, the Muslims may indeed be monotheists. (Generally, this is the established position of prominent Torah scholars past and present, but this is hardly monolithic. The more ambitious reader can research the position of the Tzitz Eliezer.) Nevertheless, their monotheism is irrelevant, since they are an ideology of murder. Their ravenous blood deity is not Hashem, Heaven forbid. Allah is a drinker of innocent blood.”
The Torah’s solution hasn’t changed: Parshat Masai. “Vehorashtem”- “You shall drive out all the land’s inhabitants before you, and you shall destroy all their prostration stones, all their molten images you shall destroy, and all of their high places you shall demolish.” (Numbers 33: 52-53) It continues: “If you do not dispossess the inhabitants of the land, those whom you allow to remain shall be barbs in your eyes and thorns in your sides, and they shall harass you in the land in which you live. Then, I will do to you what I had planned to do them.” (Numbers 33:55-56)
Many years ago, Rabbi Meir Kahane insisted that transferring the Arabs out of Eretz Yisroel was the only solution. So many years later, the unspoken and politically taboo concept of Arab transfer remains the only honest response to an enemy who cannot live with those who share his own nationality/religion, let alone those they see as accursed dhimmis. The ticking time bomb of “Israeli-Arabs” represents a fifth column. They don’t need to be a majority. They are powerful enough when they align with the left to affect our national policy. We saw that with the Oslo Accords. No amount of Turkish coffee will ever rehabilitate a culture and ethos of jihad and “martyrdom”. It will only ensure that more Jews are gutted with knives in the parking lots of supposed safe havens.
One final note: While perusing Ari’s writings to get insight into his life, I discovered that he had a consistent position regarding Arab terrorists: No terrorist should be allowed to survive his act of terror. Ari did his utmost to destroy his killer. Perhaps now, those self-righteous moralists (not a few from the religious camps) who attacked Elor Azaria for killing a terrorist after he was restrained, will shut their mouths.  Elor is a living hero. I could care less with the argument that Elor was afraid that the Arab terrorist had an explosive on his person. My Torah based morality requires no such explanation or excuse. If it could be proven otherwise, his actions would remain noble. By killing the terrorist, Elor assured that the barbarian would never be released from prison to kill another Jew, something which Heaven forbid could very well happen to Ari’s killer. We’ve seen it time and again when governments release Arabs with Jewish blood on their hands. Likud governments do it as well as their Labor counterparts. Elor guaranteed that no future orphans and widows would grieve from those hands. Yet if a recent report is correct, he can’t even obtain a gun today to protect himself.
Ari Fuld was stolen from this world, because Jewish blood is treated cheaply by the Israeli government. With a culture of havlaga corroding every fiber of government, any Arab with a knife can casually enter a local area where Jews buy groceries with the deluded self-perception of safety. The Left cultivates this disease with their appeasement and indoctrination via media, culture, academia, education, and their surrogates in government. The new “rightist” peaceniks are as insane as the craven Likud and the classical left. Because despite their pretense to not being leftist (by insisting that they oppose territorial compromise) their darling ideologies of “indigenous rights” and “peace” are beloved leftist ideals that every sane person should reject regardless of its peculiar new face.  
The new peace movements speak of building relationships, while Arabs ensure that our cemeteries grow larger. Until the Arabs understand Jewish might, they will continue to bleed us. Our blood is more precious than buildings or trees, neither of which impresses them. Those who congregate at the site of Ari’s murder with non-representative samplings of token Arabs, will have blood on their hands when the next Jew is gutted. And it will happen. The ingredients are simple, and they are everywhere. An Arab with the requisite “oh-so common” Jew-hatred, the will and intent to kill, and a simple kitchen knife.
Our lesson to Ari’s spilled blood should not be one of love and coexistence. Only the mad would see in such horror the need to march in “the mercy of fools’” parade of self-righteous peace shamans. The lesson should be one of Jewish barzel (iron) and unrelenting cruelty to modern-day Nazis, and a commitment to the kind of government sponsored military action to make Arabs wish they were back in Arabia. And we in Israel should of course accommodate them by throwing them the hell out of Israel. They can go to Jordan or Egypt, or perhaps Germany, France, and England, which seem equally viable options. Europe deserves them. Transfer may seem extreme in today’s morally neutered age. Yet transfer is just. It is after all, the halachic requirement.

Thursday, September 13, 2018

Indigenous Idiocy


Revisiting the nonsense of "Indigenous Rights" advocacy as it pertains to Jews. The notion is foolish and contrary to Torah. Periodically we need to recirculate articles where we expose the dangers of adopting soft-boiled theories created by guilt ridden white liberal sociologists. Indigenous rights may indeed exist, but it's existence is akin to phrenology. It exists solely in the minds of simpletons and pinheads who adhere to an artificial construct, arbitrarily defined by its many adherents. They can't even agree themselves on how to define it or apply it. Click the accompanying link to read more: Indigenous Idiocy

Thursday, March 22, 2018

Ryan Bellerose Exposed (Nasty Image) - When Ryan Believed In "the Nakba"

 

As I promised. Part II of our never-ending expose on Ryan Mervin Bellerose, one of the most ignorant, racist, clowns on the hasbara scene today. 

In the interest of candor, I must admit that from a personal perspective I have the unique ability to get under this buffoon's skin as no one else can, with the exception of perhaps one or two other people. I can trigger Ryan like one of Pavlov's dogs with the ease of a Twitter tweet. Ryan harbors a disturbing latent fixation with me and his reaction to this unwholesome-man-crush, compels him to vent. His interest both intrigues and disgusts him. Yet his disturbing fixation is real as evidenced by the image on the left. I am not the sole focus of his pent-up frustrations. But I am pleased to be one of the more successful players who irritates this barnacle, who needs to choose his own identity and leave Jews alone.

I am obsessed with this grotesque personality, in all candor. But I have no choice. This is after all, a man who went on a campaign against "The Judean Hammer FB page" to report us on countless occasions, and cyber-bullied untold numbers of mutual friends to "unfriend us" or he would unfriend them themselves. We have the screenshots and we have the firsthand accounts, since a great many of his "friends" who bash us publicly on Ryan's wall, regularly report back to us. Additionally, he churns out lies about us, and more egregiously refuses to intellectually respond to anything. "A**hat" is his standard response to discourse. Small wonder that even the clueless, useless, liberal Bnai Brith of Canada eventually canned him.

Not that long ago, Ryan Bellerose expressed such sentiments as the following many of which can be found in the video below:
  • That he empathized with "the nakba" and Palestinian suffering.
  • That "nakba denial" was akin to holocaust denial. (min. 5:10-6:20)
  • That Jews engaged in atrocities against Arabs. (min. 9:50-11:50)
  • That the Deir Yassin blood libel was accurate.
  • That the solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict necessitated a three to four Arab state solution. That you can't say one side is indigenous and the other side isn't. (the indigenous rights argument is nonsense, but this is contrary to everything Ryan rants about today. 
  • Astoundingly, that Israel's birth was colonial, contrary to everything he says today (12:50-14:07)
  • That Indians in America experienced a holocaust. Ryan still believes that he personally experienced a holocaust. Ryan also believes that Canada is an apartheid state.
  • That he considered the antisemitic scholar Edward Said and the post-Zionist Benny Morris to be his favorite historians.
Many of these sentiments can be found in the following Youtube debate, which Ryan participated in just a few years ago. At the time Ryan considered himself a well-read expert, and Ryan surely doesn't want you to see this video where he fawns over his jew-hating (but polite) Arab opponent.In truth, one has to listen to the entire debate to appreciate that Ryan doesn't know anything and that his positions change with the wind.



All of these positions are well-documented in the form of videos, audios, screenshots, articles, and posts which Ryan wishes didn't exist. Yet they do exist, and we have them all in our reserves, including some very interesting interesting things that have never been seen before. 

At the time that he articulated these sentiments, Bellerose fancied himself a well-read expert, yet today he continues to defend dangerous hasbara personalizes such as CUFI's evangelical pastor Dumusani Washington, the unrepentant former(?) messianic Kay Wilson, and the many religious Jews in Israel who defend and enable evangelical missionaries in Israel. Ryan Bellerose is a dangerous bottom-feeder. Fortunately he is reviled across the spectrum and people are waking up to the fact that he is a walking cesspool and a con-man. 

Ryan changes with the wind. From the left-wing Bnai Brith to the centrist Left "StandWithUs" to the hasbara shills of Israellycool and other weak-kneed outlets, Ryan will grovel and say anything for an audience. Vacillating between moderation, and trying to be a hard-liner when it suits him Ryan has no business speaking on any Jewish issues. 
Furthermore, his venal behavior exposes him time and again as one with latent antisemitic tendencies which come out whenever Jews disagree with him. Like when he didn't like the Rabbanut's traditional halachic position on the criteria for being a Jew and this fat non-Jew had the audacity to tell the Rabbanut to go piss up a rope. When a gentile speaks this way it speaks volumes about his true nature.

Ryan may feel that he is being unfairly targeted, but he started this fight when he decided to interfere with Jewish interests. And yet despite being a third-tier hasbarite, he is dangerous, since as a pandering, fence-straddling, slug, Ryan will shift and align with the wind. And along the way he defends Jewish collaborators with missionaries (Hayovel supporters), defends actual missionaries themselves (Dumisani Washington), and former messianics who never admitted their past and did public teshuvah (Kay Wilson). Not to mention he introduces un-Jewish concepts (indigenous rights) to a debate he has no business engaging in as an outsider, and he has the gall to opine on matters of Jewish law.

On the eve of Yom Haatma'ut, we thank Hashem for miracles. I will close with something I wrote on Twitter today:

Tuesday, March 20, 2018

Hasbara’s Mascot

Why do I dwell on the annoying personage known as Ryan Bellerose? In truth, he’s a largely unknown loser who haunts the hasbara world with multiple FB accounts. As an unemployed, college drop-out, he lacks the basic qualities which keeps him relegated to a tier-three hasbarite. But in many ways he epitomizes everything that is wrong with hasbara. And like barnacles on a ship, he represents a persisting irritation which clings to the ship, and ultimately undermines the integrity of the ship. 

He is ill qualified to speak about anything outside the realm of fantasy novels, ring dings, and online gaming. Yet as a racist, SJW, arrogant, con-man, he should never be put in any position to opine on matters relating to Jews or Israel. Ryan made a career out of being an unemployed college dropout hasbara fraud. His gimmick. Playing the role of an angry “oppressed” Indian who hates white people. His indigenous rights nonsense is about as scientific as phrenology. In truth Ryan is his own worst enemy. He spews nonsense like a broken sewer pipe. And he flip flops on issues with the tide. Plus he is as obnoxious as the day is long. And being that I cause him sleepless nights, I should continue to expose his nasty personality and continue to give him more. A cursory look at Bellerose reveals that his tentacles extend into every nasty corner of hasbara, from the eunuchs of SWU, to Kay Wilson, to missionary Dumisani Washington, to the religious enablers of missionaries in Eretz Yisrael.

So here we go. Part 1: Another look at Racist Ryan‬, who thinks he's a tough guy by going after Louis Farrakhan in 2018. As if Farrakhan just sprouted from the ground in 2018. Even the ADL goes after Farrakhan. 



Tuesday, March 6, 2018

Quoting Mao Tse Tung: Portraits of Deranged Jewish "Activists"



A picture can be worth a thousand words as the saying goes. And so it is. Here we see the delusional Yehuda Hakohen quote Mao Tse Tung, a monster of a man who murdered over 70 million people in China. Untold numbers of atrocities and horrors. Barbarism personified. 

But evidently it's chic to quote Mao and to share his reflections on a pear. Idiocy masquerading as a "new conversation." Mao was a monster and Yehuda HaKohen is a moron. Of course this is nothing new. Hakohen has seen fit to praise such butchers as Fidel Casto in the past, and to lend support to the black supremacists of the BLM movement. 

Indigenous rights buffoon. "New peace" activist clown. Ladies and gentlemen, I present the deranged Yehuda Hakohen. A portrait of moral relativism, delusion, ego, ignorance, and a healthy dose of hypocrisy all wrapped up with the trappings of a kipa. Viva la revolution.


There is nothing creative or clever about Hakohen. His ideas of peace with the Arabs are insane. Eating falafel balls and munching on majul dates with token Arabs won't stop them from slaughtering us. For more on Yehuda Hakohen and his ilk:
And while we are at it, I will offer my vivisection of the asinine "indigenous rights" argument which is contrary to Torah and to common sense. 

Sunday, January 7, 2018

I'm Saying It's Cool: Moral Relativism Run Amuck

Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Hayovel:The Enemy Within: Limp-Wristed LAVI

Hayovel:The Enemy Within: Limp-Wristed LAVI: It’s bad enough that LAVI advocates for their un-Jewish “indigenous rights” nonsense. It is equally tragic that they represent a new “peace”...

Sunday, October 22, 2017

So Long Mervin! Non-Indigenous Bottom-feeder Gets the Boot

Hasbara's bottom-feeding, obnoxious, indigenous-fraud, Ryan Bellerose, is reportedly gone from his position as Bnai Brith's "Advocacy Coordinator" for Western Canada. Not only did Ryan not see it coming, he was so full of himself and proud of his association with the BBC, until the other day when he likely received the news. Now Ryan can take advantage of his free time and write that book on indigenous rights he promised several years ago, for which he raised over 21K!


It's a great day for self-respecting Jews who abhor the nebbish efforts of hasbara organizations, and are sickened by the constant search for unscrupulous token gentiles to "represent" Jewish interests. So-called "indigenous rights" activist, Ryan "Mervin" Bellerose epitomes this pathetic trend. So it is good to see that even the useless clowns of Bnai Brith Canada have their limits.



What a pleasure to see this buffoon exposed. We mocked him when he joined the left-wing Bnai Brith, and we will mock him again for his unceremonious removal. Clearly the big shots of Bnai Brith Canada, winners in their own right, had enough of this egotistical, obnoxious, charlatan. "The Judean Hammer" takes partial credit for his termination, because if nothing else, the Bnai Brith probably accepted our argument that he isn't even an Indian. They probably realized that they could get a more authentic Indian if they tried harder. Funny, because it wasn't that long ago when I joked that they were grooming "Eskimo Boy" to take over. 



Remember this from Sept of last year? 

“B’nai Brith has kind of died out in Western Canada,” Bellerose said. “My job is to try to help rebuild the brand and form new lodges in this region through community involvement. For example, we recently held a food drive for members of the northern Alberta reserves who were burned out of their homes by the forest fires. And we are trying to plan events that might attract different people who may not be on our radar.”

Who would have thought that it would only take a year for the Bnai Brith to realize that this guy was annoying them? It seems like ages ago when he wrote that silly piece about "why he was going to rock as Bnai Brith's advocacy coordinator".



True to form, Ryan immediately turned on those he was previously praising. (The Bnai Brith will now be considered a**hats.) He immediately took to Facebook to post the following. Coward that he is, he has since removed it:



Note the pathetic attempt to portray himself as being "unshackled". Funny how he never seemed to be shackled when he took the job and had a year and change to warm a seat in their facility. It wasn't that long ago that he was boasting about his great work with Bnai Brith. In truth, he was a glorified secretary, he just wasn't very good at it. And this particular secretary was hard on the eyes.

Imagine getting laid off for screwing up in your capacity as Western Canada's Advocacy Coordinator for Bnai Brith Canada? How does one accomplish that? What can you possibly do wrong that would compel the image conscious Bnai Brith to fire their lone "indigenous" token? Failing at that is the definition of a loser.

It is always a shame to have to waste energies on this fellow, but Ryan epitomizes so much that is wrong with "Jewish advocacy" today. As a man with associations and friendships with missionary Dumisani Washington and the duplicitous Kay Wilson; who has the chutzpah to opine on matters of Torah and Jewish identity, he warrants our attention now and again. For further reading on Ryan, check out the following links: 

Here is an homage to Ryan's tenure with Bnai Brith Canada.



A riddle for Ryan Bellerose, a genuine bad guy and a dishonest fraud who needs to return over 21 thousand dollars to the pinheads who contributed to his GoFundNe fraud. 

Question: What's more pathetic than being hired by the Bnai Brith?
Answer: Being fired by the Bnai Brith!

HA HA HA. Enjoy your unemployment, Ryan. Time to get a real job. Flip some burgers at some fast food joint. There is dignity in flipping hamburgers.

Sunday, October 15, 2017

The Bnai Brith Revisited


Question: What person in their right mind would designate the liberal "Bnai Brith" a strong Jewish organization?

Answer: Only a clueless outsider who doesn't understand a damn thing about Judaism or Jewish history. Only a foolish outsider who never read Lenny Bruce's scathing remarks back in the day when the Bnai Brith was more prominent.

A whimsical look at the impotent Bnai Brith. Right wing, you say? Ha! Only if one believes that a gay-supporting, pacifistic, two-State supporting, advocate of Islamic terrorist "refugees" constitutes a "strong Jewish advocacy organization".

Who would believe such a thing? Perhaps the kind of fool who subscribes to the multicultural fiction of "indigenous rights, where the barbarous Maori are celebrated as noble savages despite a historical proclivity for cannibalism.

Sunday, September 24, 2017

Who's Indigenous? Certainly Not Ryan!


I have a simple question. In this season of superior repentance, how can we as Jews undertake authentic collective teshuva as a nation and return to Torah values, when so many Jews have screwed up notions about their own identity? This pathetic tendency is best illustrated with the never-ending campaign of clueless Jewish organizations who recruit gentile hasbara tokens to speak on our behalf. And invariably, they pick the most self-serving, ignorant, career hasbara, parrots, who feed like gluttonous pigs on the swollen teat of Jewish stupidity. Bnai Brith token Ryan "Mervin" Bellerose is Exhibit A of this pathetic phenomenon.

Hence, the current Jewish preoccupation with asinine claims of "indigeneity", a claim which has much in common with phrenology. Plenty of dolts may see truth in pseudoscience, but delusions are the dreams of the deranged. No thinking person gives a damn about Indigenous assertions. Despite the popularity of the hasbara machine's use of "indigenous rights" to justify our Jewish claim to Israel, the naked truth is that we Jews are not indigenous to Eretz Yisrael. Because indigenous is a made-up term for liberal sociologists to quibble over. 

And yet Israel still exclusively belongs to us. For one reason: because G-d gave it to us. Flora and fauna may be indigenous, but people migrate, conquer, and settle. They fight wars of conquest and the losers disappear in one form or another. Take the Indians for example who migrated from their "indigenous" Siberia to North America, where they butchered, maimed, and displaced one another long before the white man ever spotted the continent from the sea. 


Ryan in classic form, opining on all matters of Jewish history and identity.
From a Torah perspective, we Jews have Divine rights. We arrived and conquered the Canaanites. We could have done a better job. But the archaeological record confirms biblical accounts. Tel Chatzor is evidence of Joshua's total destruction of that Canaanite stronghold. But hasbara shill Bellerose needs to ignore the Torah and history, or he might have to get a real job. His hatred for those who disagree with him somehow disappears when he argues with say a Yehuda Hakohen who considers Arabs AND Jews to be indigenous to the region. One could logically argue that Hakohen's interpretation should pose a greater threat to Ryan's argument since Hakohen's application of the term threatens his own interpretation, and Hakohen's theory would render Ryan's irrelevant. But Bellerose is a petty man, and he makes his living from this made-up term. Why fight someone who believes in the term, when he can attack those of us who discredit the whole concept? Here we see how personal gain and arrogance trump the truth.

And so, when faux-Native American "indigenous rights activist" Bellerose was questioned a short while ago about his promised book on indigenous rights, for which he raised over 21,000 dollars with a "GoFundMe" account, he responded by sharing the following sampling on his Facebook wall. Complete garbage. I was surprised that he had the chutzpah to submit such a poorly written piece as an example of a chapter.
While I frequently get under Ryan's skin and force him to resort to defamation when I obliterate his nonsensical beliefs, I was not the party he references. I would have never recommended that he submit something as proof, since I knew he could easily put together some foolishness under the pretext of it "still being in the editing phase". Prepare yourself for a cloying example of a buffoon's arrogant drivel. Neither witty nor wise, but here it is:
Ryan: Someone has been posting defamatory statements accusing me of being a "con man" asking where the book is that I have been writing and inferring that I am not writing at all.
I have been writing and the book is in first edit, I reworked some of it. I have posted excerpts before but here is a sample chapter. It hasnt passed first edit so forgive any typos and its not finished obvs
Chapter #
“There is no point in talking about shit that doesn’t matter, it’s boring and nobody cares, when you do that, you lose your audience.”- Merv
There is a school of advocacy that is extremely counterintuitive to me, basically its based on poker, where you never expose your hand so to speak. Never talk about the key issue because you might alienate some of your audience just by making the assumption that the key issue is important.
Several mainstream organisations that were doing pro israel work actually taught young advocates to avoid talking about the “settlements” because in their words “ you shouldn’t defend the undefendable.” that defeatist attitude permeated their advocacy and the adversaries not only noticed it, they attacked it. If there is one thing that I have learned in my sojourns on the interwebs its that the asshats smell inconsistency and indecision like a shark smells blood, if you act like you have something to hide, they will find it. The proper way to attack any argument is not to be spineless and apologetic but to go on the attack. If all the other side wants to talk about is the “settlements” you better be able to defend them with all your heart, because thats the hill they are choosing and you better not die on it! This is what leftwing pro Israel advocates havent figured out yet. All the flowery arguments fail if you cant defend the most basic thing, a Jews right to live in peace in his ancestral homeland. I am sure you have seen these guys ina debate, they are the ones who when asked a question, try to reframe it in an obvious way and the audience sees that and immediately thinks they are avoiding the question because they have no rebuttal. I advocate something much different, its call being unapologetic. Why should you be ashamed to be defending one of the most basic rights of indigenous people? The right to self determination on our ancestral lands? The main reason I am writing this book is that there is way too much apologetic bullshit coming form our side. “ yes the settlements are bad but israel makes cherry tomoatoes” argumentation that literally makes our side look like a bunch of people with aspergers.
The other side never admits any culpability so they dont even have to worry about looking apologetic. Our side is constantly “meeting them partway” but there is no quid pro quo.This is something the other side has done much better than our side, and its actually kind of funny because they don’t even have the advantage of having the truth on their side. They BELIEVE their side is right and They actually have to really believe in what they argue because its so rife with mental gymnastics that any honest questioning of their narrative at all leads to the realisation that their entire side is based on a foundation of bullshit. If you watch them, they tend to argue by rote, literally by the numbers. The best way to beat someone like that is to remain calm and press their buttons. They will invariably lose their cool and say something stupid, that’s when you press the attack and start throwing facts at them. If you do it before then, they might actually try to refute them, if you wait till they are losing it, they will almost always descend to insults and even if they do not, their anger makes them sound like they are weak.
I often use humour to destroy their points but if thats not your strong suit its ok, but know this, there is nothing more destructive to an overwrought emotional dramatic argument than a witty one liner. It is something I have become known for.
To understand why they work,Its important to understand a few things about the actual argumentation, the patterns they use, the tricks they try to get you off your game, and the basic phases and statements they tend to overuse. Once you understand that, you will find that the one liners come easy.
They ALWAYS go on the attack, they do this because they know they cannot defend the arabs human rights records, or the fact that the PLO and Hamas are actually terrorist groups. They cannot defend the human rights abuses or the outright child abuse and animal abuse endemic in arab society in the levant, so instead they will start off with what I call the “baffle them with bullshit” technique, basically they will introduce several antisemitic or anti Israel tropes into their opening as possible, knowing that you cannot refute every single one without sounding pendantic or overbearing. I will pick the most egregious one and refute that one THOROUGHLY, and while making sure to say “ there are too many lies for me to refute every single one so I picked the worst one.” now the moderator might say “please feel free to refute them” in which case you destroy each one, but if he doesn’t, then you still introduce doubt to anyone listening/watching.
Now instead of just refuting their points you MUST immediately go on the attack, depending on their statement you will have a few options. My favourite one is to question their most common and bombastic claims.
Ie “israel is an apartheid state” the immediate response is not to say “ no its not.” say “ Ok if you make that claim, an apartheid state is one that has two seperate laws for two seperate people in the same nation state, can you please tell me 3 laws that make israel an apartheid state?.” now you just showed the audience that you know what the real definition of apartheid is, while asking them to back up a claim that cannot be backed up.
“Israel is illegal under international law!” really? Can you please quote those laws because actually under UN resolution 242, israel is absolutely a legal and valid state as determined by the league of nations at san remo and reinforced by the Un with resolution 242, so which laws exactly are you quoting?
I will go into detail in a later chapter with the standard arguments and some good responses but I hope you see the difference between responding aggressively and just being defensive.
One thing I like to lead with is something I use when my opponent uses the “rising voice” trick. I am sure you have all seen it, its when someone starts off speaking quietly and slowly raises their voice, until at the denoument, they are literally yelling. Its a way to engage people emotionally and a historical figure who used it to great effect was someone all Jews should know about. Adolf Hitler. If you watch his speeches, he always starts off calm, but works himself up into a froth, repeating key statements and slowly getting louder and louder until he is yelling. He used flourishing hand motions and table pounding for emphasis as well. Many arab orators use this technique as well. Funny that.
So when my opponent uses it, I always refer to them being from the “adolf hitler school of public speaking” almost every time several people will recognise it and laugh. I sometimes even mock them with a short impersonation to show how facile and transparent that technique is to anyone who is paying attention.
Also think of a good argument as fishing, you cant just drop a line and grab the fish, you gotta bait the hook, you gotta set the hook and then you reel it in carefully. I think the bait is that they think you wont refute their bullshit, the hook is the mistake they invariably make with making an untrue statement and the reeling in, is you making damn sure that everyone listening can see the lie. Because here is the thing about debates, if you tell a lie in one, and get caught, you lose. Because once people see you lie, you lose credibility. This is why you gotta be prepared, and also never say anything you do not believe. I am not talking about picking at dates or stats, if they say “in 1945” when you know it was 47 just say “47” and dont refer back to it, you made your point that you knew and they didn’t, I am talking about stuff like “ The Jews were never living there” kind of stuff, thats when you hammer home every point you know that shows they were.
I expect the apology and donation to shortly follow, you know who you are.
absolutely no regards
Ryan

See what happens when you type in "hasbara clown" as a Google search 
🤡? Ryan shows up, along with an anti-Semitic "Pennywise" meme, Elizabeth Warren, Kay Wilson and even notorious missionary Dumisani Washington. Both alongside Bellerose!













Portrait of a bottom-feeding, halacha denigrating, white-hating bigot. The mascot for the "Oppression Olympics", a foolish social justice term that Ryan dishonestly takes credit for coining. 





It is no wonder that Ryan "works" for Bnai Brith Canada. As an angry white liberal who decided to go native in middle age, he is the by-product of a certain degree of privilege which he now feels guilty about and rejects. With his petulant contrived sense of righteousness. Ryan exposes that he is every bit the social justice complaining cream-puff that he rails against. Yet all of this should be irrelevant to Jews, since such a person has nothing to say to Jews about anything. Not about Torah. Not about Israel. And not about identity. Ryan is irrelevant to Native-Americans. He doesn't speak for the Metis in Canada, or any indigenous people anywhere. So what does he have to say to us Jews? Jews should learn from the Indians and Metis. They ignore Ryan Bellerose and so should we.

Let the Master of Ceremonies of the Oppression Olympics continue to do his thing. He has a Facebook page, a handful of accounts, which provide him a forum for an irrational echo-chamber. Thinking Jews see through his ruse. Oppression Olympics? Thy Name Is Mervin.



#DivineRightsNotIndigenousRights
#TorahRising

http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/fuchs-focus/263683/2016/03/03/

http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/fuchs-focus/we-are-still-not-indigenous-a-counter-response/2016/03/28/

http://thejudeanhammer.blogspot.co.il/2017/06/ryan-bellerose-hasbara-bottom-feeder.html

Tuesday, September 19, 2017

Disingenuous But Not Indigenous



Ryan Mervin Bellerose, Bnai Brith Canada's token "indigenous" gentile hasbarite, recently made a disgusting comment about the Israeli Rabbinate. Feel free to check out my post from last week: http://thejudeanhammer.blogspot.co.il/2017/08/hasbara-or-halacha_3.html

Any sensitive Jew should be outraged that a non-Jewish ignoramus would have the gall to speak so crudely of a Jewish institution which, although flawed and riddled with problems, is tasked with the impossible responsibility of addressing halachic matters on a national scale. Furthermore, that any non-Jew would denigrate halacha and DECIDE for us Jews, the definition of a Jew is repulsive and it speaks volumes about who he is.

Now it is well-known in normal circles that Bellerose is a loud-mouthed buffoon. He is not even an Indian, and he often lies and tries to identify as both Metis and Indian, which are mutually exclusive identities, and is generally understood by both groups to be so. The problem is that Ryan's Facebook wall is an echo-chamber of non-thinkers, and even his orthodox Jewish supporters are giving him a pass, even though by some of their comments, they are clearly disgusted by his most recent outburst.

At "The Judean Hammer" we aren't afraid of anyone, and we will call out this fraud until it sinks into people's head that he is a conniving, bigoted, charlatan, who has no genuine respect for Jews or our holy Torah.


Bellerose on the Rabbinate:



As always share with your friends. Expose this con man.

#Who's IndigenousCertainlyNotRyan

Wednesday, August 9, 2017

Indigenous Rights Activism: How To Scam People and Make Money





SCAM ALERT UPDATE! I recently stumbled upon the following advertisement on Facebook, which got me thinking. As chutzpadik as it is for a person to shnorrer funds to write a book, faux-indigenous rights activist Ryan Bellerose only required $27 for his ongoing GoFundMe scam (his promised book on "Jewish indigenous rights"), since this is the likely route this lazy, low-energy, slug will eventually take. That is, by turning his previously written articles into a digital book of reconstituted garbage in PDF form. After all, what sensible publisher would ever agree to work with this lazy clown?



How does this non-indigenous fellow even look at himself in the mirror? Over 21 thousand dollars raised, and not a peep about this long-awaited treatise until yesterday when he was finally put to the fire. When challenged the other day, Ryan produced the following "chapter" to prove that he has a book on the fire, or as he would call it: that he's in the final editing stages. Truly a piece of garbage that just reads like his cloying articles about identity. Just as I predicted! From Ryan's Facebook page:
Someone has been posting defamatory statements accusing me of being a "con man" asking where the book is that I have been writing and inferring that I am not writing at all.
I have been writing and the book is in first edit, I reworked some of it. I have posted excerpts before but here is a sample chapter. It hasnt passed first edit so forgive any typos and its not finished obvs
Chapter #
“There is no point in talking about shit that doesn’t matter, it’s boring and nobody cares, when you do that, you lose your audience.”- Merv
There is a school of advocacy that is extremely counterintuitive to me, basically its based on poker, where you never expose your hand so to speak. Never talk about the key issue because you might alienate some of your audience just by making the assumption that the key issue is important.
Several mainstream organisations that were doing pro israel work actually taught young advocates to avoid talking about the “settlements” because in their words “ you shouldn’t defend the undefendable.” that defeatist attitude permeated their advocacy and the adversaries not only noticed it, they attacked it. If there is one thing that I have learned in my sojourns on the interwebs its that the asshats smell inconsistency and indecision like a shark smells blood, if you act like you have something to hide, they will find it. The proper way to attack any argument is not to be spineless and apologetic but to go on the attack. If all the other side wants to talk about is the “settlements” you better be able to defend them with all your heart, because thats the hill they are choosing and you better not die on it! This is what leftwing pro Israel advocates havent figured out yet. All the flowery arguments fail if you cant defend the most basic thing, a Jews right to live in peace in his ancestral homeland. I am sure you have seen these guys ina debate, they are the ones who when asked a question, try to reframe it in an obvious way and the audience sees that and immediately thinks they are avoiding the question because they have no rebuttal. I advocate something much different, its call being unapologetic. Why should you be ashamed to be defending one of the most basic rights of indigenous people? The right to self determination on our ancestral lands? The main reason I am writing this book is that there is way too much apologetic bullshit coming form our side. “ yes the settlements are bad but israel makes cherry tomoatoes” argumentation that literally makes our side look like a bunch of people with aspergers.
The other side never admits any culpability so they dont even have to worry about looking apologetic. Our side is constantly “meeting them partway” but there is no quid pro quo.This is something the other side has done much better than our side, and its actually kind of funny because they don’t even have the advantage of having the truth on their side. They BELIEVE their side is right and They actually have to really believe in what they argue because its so rife with mental gymnastics that any honest questioning of their narrative at all leads to the realisation that their entire side is based on a foundation of bullshit. If you watch them, they tend to argue by rote, literally by the numbers. The best way to beat someone like that is to remain calm and press their buttons. They will invariably lose their cool and say something stupid, that’s when you press the attack and start throwing facts at them. If you do it before then, they might actually try to refute them, if you wait till they are losing it, they will almost always descend to insults and even if they do not, their anger makes them sound like they are weak.
I often use humour to destroy their points but if thats not your strong suit its ok, but know this, there is nothing more destructive to an overwrought emotional dramatic argument than a witty one liner. It is something I have become known for.
To understand why they work,Its important to understand a few things about the actual argumentation, the patterns they use, the tricks they try to get you off your game, and the basic phases and statements they tend to overuse. Once you understand that, you will find that the one liners come easy.
They ALWAYS go on the attack, they do this because they know they cannot defend the arabs human rights records, or the fact that the PLO and Hamas are actually terrorist groups. They cannot defend the human rights abuses or the outright child abuse and animal abuse endemic in arab society in the levant, so instead they will start off with what I call the “baffle them with bullshit” technique, basically they will introduce several antisemitic or anti Israel tropes into their opening as possible, knowing that you cannot refute every single one without sounding pendantic or overbearing. I will pick the most egregious one and refute that one THOROUGHLY, and while making sure to say “ there are too many lies for me to refute every single one so I picked the worst one.” now the moderator might say “please feel free to refute them” in which case you destroy each one, but if he doesn’t, then you still introduce doubt to anyone listening/watching.
Now instead of just refuting their points you MUST immediately go on the attack, depending on their statement you will have a few options. My favourite one is to question their most common and bombastic claims.
Ie “israel is an apartheid state” the immediate response is not to say “ no its not.” say “ Ok if you make that claim, an apartheid state is one that has two seperate laws for two seperate people in the same nation state, can you please tell me 3 laws that make israel an apartheid state?.” now you just showed the audience that you know what the real definition of apartheid is, while asking them to back up a claim that cannot be backed up.
“Israel is illegal under international law!” really? Can you please quote those laws because actually under UN resolution 242, israel is absolutely a legal and valid state as determined by the league of nations at san remo and reinforced by the Un with resolution 242, so which laws exactly are you quoting?
I will go into detail in a later chapter with the standard arguments and some good responses but I hope you see the difference between responding aggressively and just being defensive.
One thing I like to lead with is something I use when my opponent uses the “rising voice” trick. I am sure you have all seen it, its when someone starts off speaking quietly and slowly raises their voice, until at the denoument, they are literally yelling. Its a way to engage people emotionally and a historical figure who used it to great effect was someone all Jews should know about. Adolf Hitler. If you watch his speeches, he always starts off calm, but works himself up into a froth, repeating key statements and slowly getting louder and louder until he is yelling. He used flourishing hand motions and table pounding for emphasis as well. Many arab orators use this technique as well. Funny that.
So when my opponent uses it, I always refer to them being from the “adolf hitler school of public speaking” almost every time several people will recognise it and laugh. I sometimes even mock them with a short impersonation to show how facile and transparent that technique is to anyone who is paying attention.
Also think of a good argument as fishing, you cant just drop a line and grab the fish, you gotta bait the hook, you gotta set the hook and then you reel it in carefully. I think the bait is that they think you wont refute their bullshit, the hook is the mistake they invariably make with making an untrue statement and the reeling in, is you making damn sure that everyone listening can see the lie. Because here is the thing about debates, if you tell a lie in one, and get caught, you lose. Because once people see you lie, you lose credibility. This is why you gotta be prepared, and also never say anything you do not believe. I am not talking about picking at dates or stats, if they say “in 1945” when you know it was 47 just say “47” and dont refer back to it, you made your point that you knew and they didn’t, I am talking about stuff like “ The Jews were never living there” kind of stuff, thats when you hammer home every point you know that shows they were.
I expect the apology and donation to shortly follow, you know who you are.
absolutely no regards
Ryan


#Who's IndigenousCertainlyNotRyan

Wow. You will never get those moments back, the one's I caused you to waste by reading such nonsense. And his disclaimer about editing gives him a window of a lifetime to always be putting the final touches on the book. A real page-turner. Mind you, this is coming from a clown who works for the liberal eunuchs of the Bnai Brith. 

I am actually hoping that Bellerose puts out something one day, since it will be the worst thing he ever does; disseminating a treasure trove of foolishness, inconsistencies, contradictions, and historical fallacies. It will be a goldmine to undermine his never-ending stream of nonsensical beliefs. In the meantime, those who even contributed a shekel to this scam, should be screaming from the rooftops: